Hey maybe direct action and voting aren’t mutually exclusive? Maybe you can plant a garden and take two minutes to fill out a form to ensure people don’t lose their rights? Maybe you’re feeding a very dangerous narrative by slapping an unnecessary binary onto political action with a “good” and “bad” option and making people feel they have to be limited to one or the other when both are necessary for change?
there was once, like, a whole weekend where users on this website legitimately thought that you could defy the laws of equivalency and make infinite chocolate by cutting your chocolate bar a certain way.
There was one day in which every post, icon, and ask was the same picture of a generic white man from a popular tv show.
there was once, like, a whole weekend where users on this website legitimately thought that you could defy the laws of equivalency and make infinite chocolate by cutting your chocolate bar a certain way.
My favourite thing about that show is how he treats servers. It was also the source of some very intense fantasies when I was a barista of him busting into my cafe, calling my boss a fucking idiot, then taking me against the broken dishwasher.
favorite part of the witcher is seeing all these self-identified heterosexual men on twitter thirsting over henry cavill. put henry cavill in tight leather pants and suddenly a lot of men are learning something about themselves
stop leaving the best parts in the tags
Sliding fuckability scale:
1. Henry Cavill as Superman. Very Good and clean. Utterly unfuckable.
2. Henry Cavill as cold war era spy in Man From U.N.C.L.E. Less morally upstanding, quite clean. Attractive but not sexy.
3. Henry Cavill as a CIA Assassin Mission Impossible. Kills people, some scruff but still groomed. Fuckable.
4. Henry Cavill as Geralt. Morally grey, absolutely filthy. Peak Fuckablity.
I’m honestly not even surprised by this revelation
I remember this other thread where someone described him as “whatever the opposite of ‘he cleans up well’ is”.
let’s say, hypothetically, i did the mash. and, for the sake of debate, let’s say it was a monster mash. would that, hypothetically speaking, mean that it would be a graveyard sm
in ‘the creation of adam’, Man lies back indolently, reaching out idly in response to the forwards-thrusting touch of divinity, well within reach but lacking the drive to take it, representing the naive state of original mankind, unburdened by consciousness or desire.
In this fascinating modern take, however, the artist instead shows Man as a driving force, frantically throwing aside all barriers and restrictions in pursuit of his goal: a goal which remains impossible to reach. Fast food, representing compromise for survival in the face of an uncaring and overstressing world, hangs awkwardly in the center of an uncrossable abyss. Note the use of highly-rendered tensed musculature to imply physical effort, emphasized by the contrast with loose, hanging fabric, and also the lack of effort on the part of the employee: She is trying, and were she reach out just a little further, then through their collaboration would Man attain his goal. But, the strictures of her position allow only a certain amount of human generosity and kindness. The structures we build as humanity prevent us from doing all that we can to help one another, and this remains true even when presented with a fellow human willing risk death, to survive.
